ACSM     A.C.S.M.     
American Congress on Surveying & Mapping
Home Membership Conferences Search ACSM eStore Message Board
About ACSM
 
ALTA/ACSM
Standards

 
Member
Organizations

 
Sustaining
Members

 
ACSM Council
of  Sections

 
State Affiliates
 
Government
Affairs

 
Employment
Opportunities

 
Education and
Certification

 
"For Students Only"
 
Publications
 
Industry News
 
Advertising
 
FIG
 
ACSM - THOSA
Hydrographer
Certification

 
Certification of
Floodplain Surveyors

 
Certified Federal
Surveyors (CFedS)

 
Contests and Awards
 
ACSM-CaGIS Map Competition
 
ACSM-CaGIS Map Competition Archives
 
Conference Sessions
Papers Archives

 
ACSM Information Archives
 
Related Links
 
State Rules and Regs
 
Contact Us
 
DRAFT

Government Affairs Update

May 2003

 

From Congress

 

UPDATE: H.R. 1816 National Flood Insurance Program Fairness Act
Title: To amend the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 to ensure homeowners are provided adequate notice of flood map changes and a fair opportunity to appeal such changes.
Sponsor: Rep Stark, Fortney Pete [CA-13] (introduced 4/11/2003)      
Latest Major Action: 4/11/2003  Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

See April’s Government Affairs Update for a summary of this bill.

Curt Sumner and Laurence Socci recently met with Andrea Salinas from Rep. Pete Stark’s office to discuss this bill. Ms. Salinas gave us a background of the bill, and we had questions about the bill, particularly Section 3:

 SEC. 3. REIMBURSEMENT OF PROPERTY OWNERS FOR COSTS INCURRED IN REQUESTS TO REMOVE PROPERTY FROM BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS.

Section 1360 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4101) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

`(k) REIMBURSEMENT OF PROPERTY OWNERS FOR COSTS INCURRED IN REQUESTS TO REMOVE PROPERTY FROM BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS- If an owner of a real property incurs expense in connection with the services of surveyors, engineers, or similar services, but not including legal services, in effecting any request to the Director to remove the property from inclusion within the base flood elevations established under flood insurance map panels, and the Director grants such request in whole or in part, the Director shall reimburse such individual for such expense. The amount of such reimbursement shall be determined by the Director, based on the ratio of the successful portion of the request as compared to the entire request. The Director shall apply such ratio to the average cost of such services in the community for jobs of a similar size.'.

 

Ms. Salinas noted that she was pleased to hear from us and told us that the language of the bill was put together by herself and Legislative Counsel. She also mentioned that FEMA is “partially opposed” to the language of the full bill.  We agreed that we need to have a follow-up meeting with Ms. Salinas, however, we would like to get members’ views on the bill. The entire bill can be seen at http://thomas.loc.gov , in the Bills section, type HR 1816. Please look it over and contact us with questions or comments, we will discuss them with Ms. Salinas at our next meeting.

 

RESPA Meeting

 

Curt Sumner, Laurence Socci and John Kohl once again met with representatives from RESPA to discuss the possibility of including language advising buyers about the need for a survey before closing on their property. In addition to Kenneth Markison, Asst. General Counsel, Rhonda Daniels, Senior Attorney, and Dr. William Reid, Economist who were at the last meeting, we also met with John Weicher, Asst. Secretary for Housing, Federal Housing Commission. They told us that they are still going over responses to the Notice which was published in the Federal Register, but they wanted to get more information from us. The bulk of the meeting was spent going over actual survey drawings prepared by John Kohl which demonstrated the need for a survey prior to closing. All of the RESPA participants seemed impressed with the demonstration because they were able to see in black and white what we have been trying to tell them. All in all it was a very good meeting.

 

COFPAES Delegate Meeting

COFPAES recently held its Spring Delegate meeting. Here are some highlights:

Sustaining Membership

At the previous delegate meeting, COFPAES voted to establish a new category of “Sustaining Member” which would be open to any private firm in which a principal was a member of one of the COFPAES member associations. The current Sustaining Members are:

Brooks & Brooks, Inc.

Construction Plus

Alvord, Burdick & Howson

Whitney Bailey Cox & Magnani

HDR, Inc.

If you picked up a membership brochure at the Phoenix conference, please fill it out and send it in as soon as you can.

 

GSA Schedule and Construction as a Commercial Item

GSA has taken some steps to clarify that the Federal Supply Schedule should not be used for procurement of A/E services, as defined in FAR Part 36. The Professional Engineering Services, IT and Environmental Services schedules all now have disclaimers against use for FAR Part 36 services. COFPAES will continue efforts to seek further reform of the schedules.

 

Water SRF Legislation

Water/wastewater state revolving fund legislation, HR 20, has been introduced in the House by Rep. Kelly (R-NY) with QBS included. A similar bill introduced by Rep. John Duncan (R-TN), does not contain the provision. It is likely that the Duncan bill will be considered. COFPAES is working with Duncan’s staff to get language similar to the language in Kelly’s bill included.

 

TEA-21 Reauthorization

COFPAES staff has begun discussions with Congressional staff on the COFPAES endorsed provisions for TEA-21. These provisions include QBS clarification and an attempt to provide a balanced solution to the in-house vs. contracting out issue, and clarification of the FAR design build process.

 

ACEC Value Based Delivery Proposal

ACEC has drafted a bill for introduction in Congress. The bill is entitled the Infrastructure Delivery, Efficiency and Accountability Act of 2003. It would repeal the two phase design build procedures enacted in 1996 and replace them with the more generic “project delivery system” authority for all civilian and military agencies. It would, however, preserve the role of QBS in the direct A/E contracting process.

ASCE has recommended that COFPAES oppose the proposed bill. Tommy Brooks recommended that ACSM oppose the proposed bill, and Laurence Socci agrees. Socci faxed a copy of the bill to John Matonich and Curt Sumner for their review and comments.

 

Blacklisting Legislation

The contractor responsibility or “blacklisting” issue is back, as a legislative proposal. Although the bill is not expected to be considered, COFPAES will go on record in opposition to the legislation, consistent with past opposition to the proposed, and later withdrawn, regulations. ACSM JGAC discussed this bill, we agreed to monitor it as it stands in its present form.

 

SF 330 Training and Education

The new SF 330 to replace the 254 and 255 will take affect later this year. COFPAES has previously agreed to consider offering training sessions or education programs on the SF-330. Don Evick of the Corps of Engineers has indicated some availability to help teach the course.

 

Agency Views on QBS

During the JAECFC meeting in the morning of April 30, Dell Palmer monitored a focus groups session with agency officials to discuss the importance of QBS in the procurement process. Laurence Socci did not attend the morning session, however, the feeling of the other COFPAES delegates regarding the session was that it was very productive and informative.

 

Services Acquisition Reform Act (SARA) HR 1837

The House Government Reform Committee, chaired by Rep. Tom Davis (R-VA), approved a revised version of the Services Acquisition Reform Act (SARA). The committee adopted an amendment that would expand to civilian agencies the authority that Defense Department contracting officers already have to seek competition for products offered by Federal Prison Industries (FPI) if they determine, based on market research, that a better overall product is available in the private sector. Among the other amendments adopted were an amendment requiring full disclosure of noncompetitive contracting for reconstruction contracts in Iraq, and an amendment that prohibits the use of numerical quotas or targets that are not based on analysis associated with public-private competitions.

 

UPDATE

On Thursday, May 23, Rep. Tom Davis (R-Va.) attached his Services Acquisition Reform Act legislation to the Fiscal 2004 Defense Authorization bill, HR 1588 which recently passed the House. When the House overwhelmingly passed the Defense bill, SARA moved closer to changing the way the government buys services.

Most of the provisions of the acquisition bill were passed by the House Armed Services Committee before the bill moved to debate in the full House of Representatives.


The Defense bill also includes a provision that would prohibit the Office of Management and Budget from setting goals for opening federal jobs to competition with the private sector under Circular A-76 unless the goal is based on “considered research and sound analysis” and is consistent with the agency’s mission.

The Senate also passed its version of the Defense Authorization Act, S 1050, 98-1, but it did not include the SARA provisions. House and Senate members now will negotiate the differences between the bills in conference committee.

Both Davis, the chairman of the Government Reform Committee, and Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), the chairwoman of the Governmental Affairs Committee, have been named as conferees to the committee.

 

Federal Prison Industries

The Defense Department, on May 15, issued a proposed rule to implement the statutory requirements that contracting officers do marketing research before purchasing a product offered by FPI and to seek competition if an FPI product is found to be “noncomparable” to products available from the private sector. The statutory provisions regarding FPI came about because of pressure from the private sector that FPI’s mandatory source status (the requirement that agencies award FPI contracts for products it provides without competition) was putting small businesses owned by law abiding citizens out of business and wasting taxpayer money.

Under the rule, an agency contracting officer may not require a contractor, or subcontractor at any tier, to use FPI as a subcontractor for performance of a contract by any means. Further, the rule prohibits a contracting officer from entering into a contract with FPI that allows an inmate worker access to: classified data; geographic data regarding the location of surface and subsurface infrastructure providing communications or water or electrical power distribution; pipelines for the distribution of natural gas or other commodities; or personal/financial information about a private citizen, without prior consent of the individual.

 

Pre-Disaster Mitigation

The coalition formally known as the Floodplain Coalition has been changed to the Stafford Act Coalition, and unfortunately the purpose of the coalition has changed as well. As the Floodplain Coalition, it was primarily concerned with flood mitigation, as the Stafford Act Coalition, it is concerned with “hazard” mitigation. In any event, Laurence Socci attended a recent coalition meeting. Speakers at the last meeting included Anthony Lowe, Division Director for Mitigation and Bob Shea, Deputy Director for Mitigation at the Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate of the Department of Homeland Security. Lowe provided an update on the status of the predisaster mitigation program, with more guidance coming soon. He anticipates a $3 million cap on projects and a means to address repetitive loss with at least one project required in each state. Coalition members shared information from individual Congressional visits including updates on appropriations. It was noted that House and Senate staff are ready to begin work on reauthorization of the predisaster mitigation program. The coalition agreed to prepare and circulate a draft letter regarding HMGP. The coalition also agreed to develop a one page document identifying the participants in the coalition and the goals of the coalition.

 

Department of Homeland Security

We are continuing to work to make ACSM more involved with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).  While everyone can agree that the mapping industry needs to be a part of the work done by DHS, there are still questions as to the best strategy for making that possible. To help answer some of those questions, Curt Sumner and Laurence Socci will meet with Jason Racette of BLM for some guidance and assistance in developing a smart strategy to approach the Department. Look for more on this issue in future updates.

 

Department of Interior Take Pride in America Campaign

Are you looking for some good community volunteer work? If so, the Department of Interior has an opportunity for you. Laurence Socci recently attended a meeting at the Department where Kit Kimball, Director, External and Intergovernmental Affairs spoke about current Department of the Interior
initiatives, including Take Pride in America. The take Pride in America Initiative is a national campaign to encourage Federal, state and local public and private partnerships and volunteer service to protect public parks, recreation areas and cultural resources. Its primary focus will be to encourage citizen stewards to dedicate time and service to help protect and restore resources and facilities in their area. Information about Take Pride in America is available at www.takepride.gov.

 

SF330 Update

 

Many of our readers have asked for updates on the status of the SF330. An article in the June 2003 edition of Engineering Times, the newsletter by NSPE, notes that SF330 may go into effect as soon as August 2003.

 

We have not received notification that this is the case, but wanted to pass along this information. ACSM will follow up on this matter for a more definite status report.

 

GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS LINKS AND INFORMATION

 

Federal Government Resources on the Web:

United States Senate - http://www.senate.gov 

U.S. House of Representatives (House Web Server) - http://www.house.gov 

Status of Legislation (Library of Congress) - http://thomas.loc.gov 

Who is my Representative in Congress? - http://www.vote-smart.org   

Email Your Member of Congress Today! http://www.MrSmith.com

Official U.S. Executive Branch Web Sites:

 http://lcweb.loc.gov/global/executive/fed.html

The White House - http://www.whitehouse.gov

 

Links to State Legislatures:

View the National Council of State Legislatures Web site

Terms of Use
Web Page Comments: Trisha.Milburn@acsm.net

Copyright © 1996-2008, American Congress on Surveying and Mapping, All Rights Reserved.